What must be provided when opinions and interpretations are included in a radon report?

When opinions and interpretations are included in a radon report, it is essential to provide the basis on which these opinions and interpretations are made. This is because having a clearly defined rationale enhances the credibility and reliability of the report. It ensures that users of the report can understand how the conclusions were drawn, what factors were considered, and which data supported the interpretations.

Providing the basis for opinions and interpretations allows stakeholders—such as homeowners, real estate agents, or regulatory bodies—to assess the significance of the findings and make informed decisions regarding radon mitigation or further testing. This is particularly important, as radon levels can have serious health implications, and understanding the context behind recommendations is vital for effective risk management.

While personal credentials, summaries of past tests, and raw data are important components of a comprehensive radon report, they do not replace the necessity of explaining the rationale behind any opinions or interpretations presented. Such context not only supports transparency but also fosters trust in the evaluator's conclusions and aids in conveying the complexities of radon measurement and mitigation strategies.